Delhi High Court has asked IRDAI to check the exclusionary clauses in Insurance Policies to make sure that insurers don’t reject insurance claims on the basis of genetic disorder. The court said that excluding people with genetic disorders from receiving health insurance is “unconstitutional” and “discriminatory and violative” of a citizen’s right to health.
Insurers usually put a ‘hereditary diseases’ clause while drawing up a contract, which also rejects claims for ailments that are contracted due to genetics. The court upheld a last year’s trial court order that directed United India Insurance to pay a sum of Rs 5 lakh to the insured. “Suffering from a genetic disorder needs medical insurance as much as others,” the court had said.
The judgment was passed after one Jai Prakash Tayal approached the trial court as United India Insurance rejected his claims citing “general exclusion clauses”. Tayal suffers from Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy, a condition that thickens portions of the heart reducing its capacity to pump blood. Tayal had taken a medical policy of Rs 5 lakh, which was renewed every year till 2012 from 2004. The complainant was hospitalised twice – in 2004 and 2006 – during which United India Insurance paid his claims but refused him the third time in 2011.
Tayal also mentioned that this exclusion was not initially a part of the contract, but was added later in a policy document without notifying him. “In effect, it would mean that large swathes of population would be excluded from availing health insurance which could have a negative impact on the health of a country. Thus, it is necessary to determine the legality of such exclusion in insurance policies… Without doing genetic testing and prescribing what is the kind of genetic disorder which is excluded, applying a general exclusion would lead to arbitrariness,” the court said.
