The Supreme Court has ruled that if the owner of the vehicle did not bother to change the ownership in registration records, he would be liable for compensation claims arising from accidents involving the vehicle even if another person owned and drove the car.

This painful legal truth dawned upon one Vijay Kumar, who had sold his car to another person on July 12, 2007. That person further sold the car on September 18, 2008. This third owner then sold the car to one Naveen Kumar, who claimed before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal that he had sold it to one Meer Singh.

While the car was allegedly in possession of Meer Singh but driven by another person, an accident took place on May 27, 2009, in which one person was killed and another injured. The tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs 3.85 lakh and ordered Vijay Kumar, whose name figured in the registration certificate, to be jointly liable with the driver of the car.

Series Navigation<< Delay No Excuse: Insurers Can’t Reject Claims Solely for Late ReportingUpdated Rules for Insurance Repositories: Amendment to Guideline 34A Explained >>

Author

This entry is part 13 of 18 in the series April 2018 - Insurance Times

Byadmin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *