Sri. Benson George

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd

Civil Appeal No. 1540 of 2022

Policy type- Third Party Insurance

The Supreme Court examined its previous decisions in Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar and Anr. (2011)1SCC 343 and Lalan D. v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited (2020)9SCC 805, and observed that the amount of compensation to be awarded under the heads, pain and suffering and loss of amenities and happiness cannot be based on a straight jacket formula. It depends upon the facts and circumstances of each case and varies from person to person who has suffered due to the accident. So far as awarding compensation under the head pain, shock, and suffering is concerned, multiple factors are required to be considered namely, prolonged hospitalization, the grievous injuries sustained, the operations underwent and the consequent pain, discomfort and suffering. Similarly, loss of amenities and happiness suffered by the claimant and his family members also depend upon various factors, including the position of the claimant post accident, and whether, he is in a position to enjoy life and/or happiness which he was enjoying prior to the accident. The Court accordingly enhanced the compensation awarded to the claimant under the head loss of amenities and happiness.

Series Navigation<< Canara HSBC Life Insurance Launches Non-Participating ‘Guaranteed Fortune Plan’What are the rules to be observed for making a proposal for insurance? >>

Author

This entry is part 10 of 16 in the series January 2023 - Insurance Times

Byadmin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *